![]() Third, an account of democratic virtues after Dewey will be outlined that complements the ‘Deweyan argument for democracy’ (IV).Īs many intellectuals of the 20th century have figured out, teleological, substantive views of ut. Second, this view of creativity and the motive of the recognition of individuality is linked to Putnam’s (1992) argument (III). First, I will introduce Dewey’s perspectival view of creativity which is foreshadowed in his article “Construction and Criticism” and interpret it in the context of Dewey’s normative criteria for democracy (II). The quality of a democracy depends on living and promoting democratic virtues on different levels of social life.Īgainst this background I argue that Dewey’s democratic virtue theory complements the Deweyan argument for democracy as reconstructed by Hilary Putnam (1992). I assume that ethics and democracy should be radically connected. more The paper discusses important elements of a democratic ethics alongside Dewey’s philosophy: the idea of perspectival creativity, Dewey’s ‘argument for democracy’, and an account of democratic virtues. The paper discusses important elements of a democratic ethics alongside Dewey’s philosophy: the i. Accordingly, Dewey’s book is not merely a piece of “world war literature”, first, because its line of argument also appears in books by Dewey, which are surely not part of this category, and second, because the Hegelian Emptiness Charge is a variant of what Dewey calls a philosophical fallacy. Furthermore, the chapter suggests that the role of Hegel’s Emptiness Charge in German Philosophy and Politics should be considered in light of Dewey’s theory of growth. ![]() Nevertheless, the controversy serves to clarify Dewey’s line of argument and to discuss parallels with and differences from the world war genealogy and the Frankfurt School’s theory of immanent critique. While Dewey’s reading of Kant is, indeed, flawed, Ebbinghaus and Geismann misconceive Dewey’s argumentative intent. It argues that the polemical reaction to Dewey’s book by Julius Ebbinghaus, reiterated through Axel Honneth and Ebbinghaus’s student Georg Geismann, is based on talking at cross-purposes. more This chapter discusses the controversy over the legacy of Kantian moral philosophy in Dewey’s German Philosophy and Politics. This chapter discusses the controversy over the legacy of Kantian moral philosophy in Dewey’s Ger. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |